Home Permits Increase

Posted ago by Cary Cox

The Commerce Department said Thursday that builders broke ground on a seasonally adjusted annual rate of 699,000 homes in January. That’s up 1.5 percent from December and reached the highest level since December 2008. Construction began work on 508,000 single-family homes last month and December single-family homes were revised up strongly to show builders started 513,000 homes – a 12 percent gain from November.

In a separate report, building permits, a gauge of future construction, rose 0.7 percent. The majority of those permits were for single-family homes. It can take 12 months for a builder to obtain a permit and construct a single-family home.

In a third report released last week, A measure of builder sentiment has risen for five straight months and is now at its highest level in nearly five years. Many builders are seeing more people express interest in buying a home, leading them to believe 2012 could be a turn-around year for the market. Mortgage rates have never been cheaper. And home sales started to rise at the end of last year.

Keep in mind that from a fundamental supply and demand standpoint, the new housing starts had to decrease to support clearing of the existing inventory. The opportunity on the purchase money side is in markets where it is cheaper to own than rent.  We’ll eventually see a return of the First Time Home Buyer to stimulate home demand for move up borrowers.

While these numbers show some improvement we must remind ourselves of the huge amount of “Shadow Inventory” held by the major banks in the country. “Shadow Inventory” are homes that are in default but have yet to be foreclosed upon by the lender. They are being allowed to maintain this “Shadow Inventory” by the federal government. Why you ask? Because if banks had to foreclose on every home in default many would go bankrupt and housing prices in many areas of the nation would plummet.

So don’t let the “Headline Numbers” fool you, always dig behind what’s being reported. Housing prices for the most part will remain subdued until all of the “Shadow Inventory” clears the system, and that could take several years.

I wouldn’t buy a new home unless you are going to be there a while and have no expectation of a big increase in value.

It’s an election year folks – keep that in mind.

A Mortgage vs The Rule of Law

Posted ago by Cary Cox

When you buy your home it is essentially a form of investment as you are expecting the value of it to be higher when you sell it. The mortgage gives you a lot of leverage in obtaining more home than you which you could pay cash. Like all investments they can either go up or down. And therein lies the problem with today’s mortgage foreclosure mess. Everyone bought their home assuming that home values only went up! No Virginia, home prices like any investment can fall in value. Just because you live in this investment doesn’t guarantee you appreciation and a profit.

Now we have the quandary that the mortgage that gave you the leverage to purchase your home, i.e., the investment is also a CONTRACT to promise to repay the loan in full to the lender that made the loan. Our entire nation is based upon “The Rule of Law” and contract law is the oldest part of this system.

But for some reason many in society today feel that the rule of law shouldn’t apply to your mortgage contract with the bank or lending institution. That for no reason in particular because you lived in the investment you should not be obligated for any losses from declining home values. In essence they think the bank should “take the loss” and not them the person that entered into the contract of a promise to repay.

In fact, there are no companies out there that advise people how to do a “Strategic Default”. That is you knowingly quit making mortgage payments even though you could afford to continue making them. One such company is youwalkaway.com and they even charge clients to make a profit to tell them how to quit paying on their mortgage.

In my opinion that company should be taken to court for they are providing a service that in of itself is highly unethical. And the case could be made that they are coercing people to break legally-binding contracts. They say it’s just a good business decision to ignore the contract you signed.

Really? In that case why have contracts. Why not just renege on any investment that doesn’t go your way? Why even have accountability in society?

Do we really want to just throw away hundreds of years of contracts law in the United States?

In my opinion at the very least anyone that walks away from their mortgage obligation when they had the ability to continue making payments should have a lifetime ban for ever purchasing a home, car, or any product for anything other than cash.

If you cannot live by the “Contractual Rule of Law” you should not enjoy the benefits of it.

More FHA Mortgage Problems

Posted ago by Cary Cox

HWAG – which stands for “Here We Go Again” - it just seems like the government will NEVER learn, especially when it comes to the FHA Mortgage. Just like the sup-prime mortgage of the last decade, if you make a loan with almost no down-payment, marginal credit, and very little reserves after closing be ready for huge mortgage default ratios on your mortgage-loan portfolio.

Really what does FHA expect to happen when you keep doing the same thing over and over, but expecting a different result? I believe that Albert Einstein called it the definition of insanity. As long as FHA is going to require minimal down-payments, marginal credit scores, and little to no reserves after closing their mortgage default ratio is going to be too high. This amount of risk could be devastating and wipe-out the FHA balance sheet and program altogether.

In fact the United States Congress has had to through the House Financial Services Committee had to pass the FHA Emergency Solvency Act to shore up the FHA balance sheet and keep it from going bankrupt. The FHA Emergency Solvency Act will do so by implementing several actions.

The first one will be raising funds through increasing the premiums on FHA mortgages for all new borrowers obtaining an FHA mortgage. So yes you guessed it closing costs are going up on FHA mortgages. Basically it is a tax to help FHA cover all the mortgages they should not have extended to less than qualified borrowers.

Other actions include improving FHA controls which hopefully means tightening FHA mortgage underwriting guidelines. We need to get away with the mantra of “FHA – Home-ownership For Everyone” and only loan money for mortgages to people that can qualify in a way that one would reasonably expect them to repay the mortgage.

FHA says they are going to also ban unscrupulous lenders from participating in the FHA mortgage program. Wait didn’t we already address that issue last decade? let’s be straight bad lenders should be put out of business , but FHA is the one that writes their mortgage underwriting guidelines. Lenders only underwrite loans based on those guidelines. So perhaps FHA needs to look in the mirror.

How bad is it? Hers is what the American Enterprise Institute had to say:

In other words, using private-sector regulatory accounting for mortgage insurers, the FHA would be deeply insolvent today and have an estimated total capital shortfall of $35 billion under the FHA’s current capital requirement—and nearly $20 billion more under the 4 percent PMI capital requirement. In addition, based on the deterioration between September and December’s results in its effective capital position, it would be experiencing a negative trend of about $15–20 billion per year. If it were a private mortgage insurer, the FHA’s fund would have been taken over by its regulator long ago.

Bottom line if you are getting an FHA loan expect to pay a higher Mortgage Insurance Premium.

Mortgage Rate Update Houston, TX

Posted ago by Cary Cox

Ratewatches Lou Barnes bring us some good mortgage rate comnetary for Houston and Texas mortgage rates.

Gradually improving US economic data and a Greek deal of some sort have relieved immediate financial fears, and so bond and mortgage rates have risen.  The rate increase is proportional to the relief. 10-year T-notes have moved from 1.92% to 2.02%, and mortgages from just under 4.00% to just under 4.125%, roughly like your kid’s fever dropping from 105 to 104.5.

However, the kid here is in a lot better shape than the kid in Europe. The most reassuring news here is the up-trend in the small business survey by the NFIB. Although its overall optimism is little better than the bottom of recessions going back 25 years, it has been improving each month since August, and only two months since 2007 have had better readings. The weakest internal component
has been sales, now the worry fading fastest.

Another legitimate breakthrough: weekly claims for unemployment insurance have dropped again, to 348,000 last week. Wobbling near 350,000 in the last couple of months has been a straight-line decline from the 400,000+ range of the last two years, and is only about 25,000 weekly above what anyone would consider normal. However, everything about this cycle is so abnormal that nobody knows if normalized layoffs will translate in to normal hiring.

More good news: inflation is not a problem. CPI arrived for January +.2% both overall and core, and in the last year overall +2.3% core and +2.9% overall. The numbers don’t seem to do much for inflation anxiety, most of which is based on conspiracy theories of one kind or another.

With us always is the cooked-books crowd. Never mind the impossible complexity of getting the dozens of inflation reports from Bureau of Labor Statistics, Commerce Department, and Fed all to tell the same false story. People who believe in rigged reports also invariably believe that government is incompetent; if so, how is a pack of fools to run such an elegant conspiracy?

A branch of this bunch objects to updating the “market basket” of goods and services to reflect current consumption. This subset also loves the horror stories of atypical consumers: a family putting a kid through college feels price pressure that a retired couple does not. There is no arguing with those who want the world never to change. Today, keeping a horse in New York City is unimaginably expensive; 100 years ago in that city a horse was the common possession of a lower-class merchant.

A serious concern, historically, is the tendency of government to print its way out of debt trouble — especially when so many authoritative voices (responsible and not) say that the Fed is “printing money” right now.

Of all the things that I discuss with my ceiling at 3:00AM, US money-printing is the least. For three reasons. The Fed is printing money to replace money that frightened banks and investors are withdrawing and burying in their back yards. If new money is in balance with money withdrawn, no inflation; the new money prevents deflation.[fbshare]

FOMC & Mortgage Rates

Posted ago by Cary Cox

The FOMC met today and for whatever reason the bond market loved it at first glance. Mortgage-Backed Securities are now trading +64 Basis Points on the day. Correcting a short-term down-trend which had led to higher mortgage rates over the last couple of weeks.

Wow what a change – here’s what the Fed had to sa:

“Information received since the Federal Open Market Committee met in December suggests that the economy has been expanding moderately, notwithstanding some slowing in global growth. While indicators point to some further improvement in overall labor market conditions, the unemployment rate remains elevated. Household spending has continued to advance, but growth in business fixed investment has slowed, and the housing sector remains depressed. Inflation has been subdued in recent months, and
longer-term inflation expectations have remained stable.

Consistent with its statutory mandate, the Committee seeks to foster maximum employment and price stability. The Committee expects
economic growth over coming quarters to be modest and consequently anticipates that the unemployment rate will decline only gradually toward levels that the Committee judges to be consistent with its dual mandate. Strains in global financial markets continue to pose significant downside risks to the economic outlook. The Committee also anticipates that over coming quarters, inflation
will run at levels at or below those consistent with the Committee’s dual mandate.

To support a stronger economic recovery and to help ensure that inflation, over time, is at levels consistent with the dual mandate, the Committee expects to maintain a highly accommodative stance for monetary policy. In particular, the Committee decided today to keep the target range for the federal funds rate at 0 to 1/4 percent and currently anticipates that economic conditions–including low rates of resource utilization and a subdued outlook for inflation over the medium run–are likely to warrant exceptionally low levels for the federal funds rate at least through late 2014.

The Committee also decided to continue its program to extend the average maturity of its holdings of securities as announced in
September. The Committee is maintaining its existing policies of reinvesting principal payments from its holdings of agency debt and agency mortgage-backed securities in agency mortgage-backed securities and of rolling over maturing Treasury securities at auction. The Committee will regularly review the size and composition of its securities holdings and is prepared to adjust those
holdings as appropriate to promote a stronger economic recovery in a context of price stability.

Voting for the FOMC monetary policy action were: Ben S. Bernanke, Chairman; William C. Dudley, Vice Chairman; Elizabeth A. Duke;
Dennis P. Lockhart; Sandra Pianalto; Sarah Bloom Raskin; Daniel K. Tarullo; John C. Williams; and Janet L. Yellen. Voting against the action was Jeffrey M. Lacker, who preferred to omit the description of the time period over which economic conditions are likely to warrant exceptionally low levels of the federal funds rate.”

Mortgages With Non-Occupying Co-Borrowers

Posted ago by Cary Cox

Many times in order to qualify for a mortgage loan the person occupying the home may not qualify for the mortgage on their own. In many cases a Non-Occupying Co-Borrower can be added to the mortgage loan so that the occupant has enough income and assets to qualify for the loan. Fannie-Mae, Freddie-Mac, and FHA all offer these types of programs. Though with the Fannie-Mae program the borrower must meet the qualifying debt to income ratios on their own. Thus, this program is not likely to be used as for the most part it defeats the purpose of using non-occupying co-borrowers on a mortgage transaction.

The FHA Non-Occupying Co-Borrower is the most liberal of all the programs. When the Non-Occupying Co-Borrower (s) are related to the borrowers by marriage, blood or law which includes parents, siblings, grandpparents, uncles, aunts, nieces, nephews, and step-relationships FHA only requires a 3.500% down-payment.

One unique feature of the FHA Non-Occupying Co-Borrower program is that they also allow for Non-Occupant Co-Borrowers that are not related in any above manner to be on the mortgage loan. When the Non-Occupying Co-Borrowers are not related to the borrowers the mortgage requires a 25% down-payment to qualify. They must also have some type of document-able long-relationship to the borrowers. For example, a long-time family friend or co-worker, employer of the borrower of the mortgage loan. Be prepared to fully document the relationship in these types of cases as FHA wants to make sure that people are not being used as straw-borrowers for illegitimate or fraudulent purposes.

As stated above in the opening paragraph to this informative post for conforming loans both Fannie-Mae and Freddie-Mac allow for Non-Occupant Co-Borrowers. Though with Fannie-Mae the borrowers must qualify on their own with regards to debt ratios. Thus, we will not discuss the Fannie-Mae program, but rather focus on the Non-Occupant Co-Borrower program offered by Freddie-mac.

Freddie-Mac differs from FHA both in that the Non-Occupant Co-Borroers must be realted to the occupants of the home, and the Freddie-Mac program requires a larger down-payment than the FHA program. In addition, the Freddie-Mac program will not have the up-front Mortgage Insurance Premium that you will find with the FHA mortgage program.

 

 

Houston Mortgage Weekly Review

Posted ago by Cary Cox

We have a great review of the past week’s mortgage activity by Lou Barnes at ratewatch.com showing lots of things happening on multiple-fronts that will affect mortgage rates going forward.

More positive US data and relaxation of European frights have combined for higher interest rates and support for Wall Street’s warm-fuzzy machine.

One week ago, downgraded credit in Europe and another failure in Greek debt negotiations had taken the 10-year T-note to 1.85% and big-equity refis a hair below 4.00%. Today, nothing is resolved in Europe, but nothing is falling, either, so 10s are back to 2.02% and even a 20%-down low-fee mortgage is near 4.25%. Adios, refis.

The mortgage spread to 10s — 2.25% — is very wide, now opened in part by the new-mortgage surcharge inflicted by Congress and the White House to pay for part of the payroll tax cut. Which the public doesn’t know, because mainstream media can’t be bothered to cover the madness, and the Fed every day trying to close the spread.

The most striking US data is the decline in weekly claims for unemployment insurance, which seem decisively to have dropped below 400,000 (352,000 last week) where we had been stuck for most of 2011. Fewer layoffs is not hiring, but it is good news. Regional Feds report up-ticks in manufacturing. Inflation is receding from its commodity push last year, overall zero change in December
CPI.

Then a data-interpretation argument, this time housing. The consensus is very optimistic that housing is past its bottom and 2012 will mark beginnings of recovery for construction and resales. I wish… oh, how I wish. The optimists assert pent-up demand, household formation, lower listed inventory, and faith. Halleluiah, brothers and sisters.

Always-suspect NAR has reported a 5% gain in sales of existing homes in December. Also a balmy, La Nina split-jet December, northern-city NFL finales and playoffs in dry 30-degree sunshine. Economic data is adjusted for season, but not weather. NAR also reported that one-third of contracts failed, its members correctly blaming mortgage underwriting and appraisals.

There is some legitimacy to hopes for new construction because builders are agile in shifting location and price point, and some places really are short of housing (North Dakota). However, new delinquencies are not improving, there is no work-off of distressed inventory, and all major measures of prices resumed their declines early last fall. The household-formation argument is based on recent historical pattern, but a hard look contradicts: we have a 1930s-style decline in birth rate, and for good or ill a sharp drop in illegal immigration.
Pent-up demand is offset by pent-up caution about prices.

The void in political leadership continues, and among economic thinkers of all stripes the widening, hysterical scatter of what-to-do-if-you-were-king.

Heaven help moderates: Democrats were thrilled this week by Mitt Romney’s exposure as wealthy (who knew?) and paying completely legal taxes, if low in some parts. This guy tithes, 10% of his considerable income to his church. Lefty Democrats think that tithing is taking 10% of somebody else’s income, and Righty Republicans are in a 16th century argument about what a church is, and whose
is acceptable.

Economic policy has two centers of confusion: stimulus versus austerity, and the central banks. Ordinarily sensible people chant: short-term stimulus, then austerity. Pardon: when is then? Less sensible people demand spending on infrastructure. Maybe we could avoid Japan’s bridges-to-nowhere, but even nifty new bridges to somewhere add what multiplier to economic growth? Governor Moonbeam’s
California bullet trains are the most questionable public investment since the projects at Pruitt-Igoe.

The central banks. I hear more and more center-thinkers drifting toward the Libertarian posse. A good guide for 10 years has been the www.hoisingtonmgt.com quarterly, but the newest issue demands “a five-year moratorium on all new Fed actions.” A bright, studious investment manager and friend (better nameless) refers to Fed “meddling.” As we enjoy better US data, and no new recession, please understand that the Fed and ECB are holding open our living space against crushing deflationary pressures. And until accidental healing, or somebody finds the support to do useful things, the issue is in doubt and central banks are playing for time.

Mortgage Outlook Part II

Posted ago by Cary Cox

We continue our series of the mortgage outlook for 2012 with a report from another great in the mortgage business Bill Fisher. Bill takes a more optimistic outlook than the author of our first in this mortgage outlook series. Here’s Bill’s take:

The New Year, 2012, is tip-towing stealthily into view, afraid we might want to throw it out before we’ve even experienced a bit of it. The fine economist Nouriel Roubini, who has rarely seen a dour forecast he didn’t like, is already mumbling incantations on the theme of another Recession. Not a Great Recession, perhaps, but a serious one.

But that is view of the future relatively predictable, and though he may prove right—as he often does—there are other voices that have very recently hazarded very different views. And they’re worth a listen.

Notice, for example, this pleasant gem from Stephen Kim, an analyst at Barclay’s Capital: “It has become increasingly apparent to us that the pieces for a housing rebound next year are beginning to fall into place.”

Whoa! Did someone actually say such a thing? Yes—and more analysts are joining the festival of optimism about the real estate market.

“‘With the exception of really hard-hit markets, the vast majority is ready to turn around,’ adds Jerry Howard, president and CEO of the National Association of Home Builders, NAHB. ‘The Washington, D.C., area is not only ripe for recovery, they need to start building units.’”

Indeed, by most reports, the construction industry will have a lot of catching up to do if the beginning signs of sustainable recovery play out well.

So I was writing about this yesterday and I opened my issue of The Wall Street Journal. Here’s what I found:

“Big money is starting to wager on housing. Hedge funds run by Caxton Associates LP, SAC Capital Advisors LP, Avenue Capital and Blackstone Group LP have been buying housing-related investments, betting on a rebound. And formerly bearish research firm Zelman & Associates now predicts a housing pickup, as does Goldman Sachs Group Inc. Other investors seem to be making the same bet. Shares of home-builders are up nearly 32% since the end of the third quarter, as measured by the Dow Jones index tracking those shares, topping a nearly 10.5% gain for the Standard & Poor’s 500.”

This is pretty serious stuff. It walks like a building recovery, it talks likea recovery…from self-fulfilling prophecy alone, it may prove to be a recovery that will gain in force and even stand up to the constant worries and doubts spawned by European politicians and banks, America’s partisan inaction, and now, the possibility that China’s economy may flatten for a time.

“‘We turned bullish on housing. A rebound is coming,’ says Andrew Law, chief investment officer at $10 billion hedge-fund firm Caxton. He expects that home prices and construction will rise in 2012.”

The inevitable caveat: Don’t expect this recovery to look the way recoveries have generally looked in the past. We’re not about to be swept into another boom that takes home sale figures skyward. The recovery will most likely remain rather slow and cumbersome when compared to what passed for “normal” in boom years (you know—when high-tech stocks, subprime mortgages and other oddities
stoked the markets’ fires).

But perhaps we can bring out the champagne at last. The experts are celebrating the likely return of a market that makes more sense, that doesn’t depend on government programs to sell its homes, and that allows everyone from builders to construction workers to mortgage loan officers to real estate professionals to make an adequate living once again. Cheers!

Bill Fisher

Mortgage Outlook Part I

Posted ago by Cary Cox

Everyone always asks this time of year what are mortgage rates going to do this coming year? Well we don’t have a crystal ball and if we could predict the future we’d be in Vegas and not the mortgage business.

We will have a year-end & year beginning series of this coming year’s mortgage outlook from some of our partners in the industry and our own opinion of where mortgage rates will be in 2012 for Houston, TX and throughout the state. Let’s just hope the Mayans didn’t do mortgages!

Our first in this mortgage series is from Lou Barnes from ratewatch.com

A New Year begins next week, and it is time for my annual dodge. Peter Drucker, one of the world’s few worthwhile business theorists: “Nobody can predict the future. The idea is to have a good grasp of the present.”

This year, no flinching from predicting. Why such foolish courage? In several econo-political arenas we have dithered and fiddled so long that things are going to happen, and all I have to do is guess what. In order from easiest to hardest….

Interest Rates. Nothing big. Maybe nothing at all. The bond market is behaving as though the Fed intends a 2.00% cap on 10-year T-notes. Why argue?

US Economy. As is. The fantastic stimulus in the pipeline should keep it afloat, but the housing drag will hold it low in the water. More people will find jobs, but paying less than the old ones. The primary risk: if the foreclosure engine resumes without an adequate mortgage supply, it will undercut home prices (again). All other risks to us are from overseas. Upside surprises will be limited to regions first-in to the housing bust, first to recover, my home state Colorado a fair bet. Don’t look for a general economic improvement, if only because fiscal austerity lies just over the horizon.

China. Got this one right last year, so double down. It had to fight inflation in 2011, and did, and is slowing as a result. Other than that, nobody knows what will happen there, not even China. Too big, and too preoccupied by power transfer under way. For the time being these leadership transfers are non-violent, but behind all the black suits, white shirts, and bland ties lies a contest that would impress Corleone and Capone.

Inflation. Just forget about it. Year after year after year people have worried about it, and it’s not in the cards. Forces of deflation are still far too strong.

Europe. Toast. Said so last year, and nothing has changed. The ECB will prevent an immediate banking collapse, so timing will depend on Clinton’s Law: “It’s the economy, stupido.” When austerity bites, economies shrink,
tax revenue falls, and budgets get worse, then we’ll see about political stability versus suicidal clinging to the euro.

That was the easy stuff. The Hard Three are related (ain’t they all?).

1. Modern central banks date to Walter Bagehot’s concept of “lender of last resort” in 1873. That entire project is on trial, doing well but not getting anywhere.  Inventing non-inflationary cash with which to put down waves of global bank runs, cushioning but unable to stop an asset-value disaster, and creating a starvation-level credit supply. Bernanke has been inspired, now guiding Draghi at the ECB, but they cannot reach the root issues. Without a root-fix, the credit house of cards just gets bigger, more vulnerable to some Ron-Paul idiot tying the hands of one of the central banks.

2. The Fed and ECB in their desperation to prevent a replay of 1930-’32 are buying time not just for the financial system, but have become unwilling co-dependents of the local politicians who are wasting every second provided
(UK excepted). I thought last year that the frustration and exhaustion of the American people would force a budget deal and a big one. Wrong. Both political parties are engaged in lies so big that they seem to believe themselves. Shrinking government and regulation will not balance our budget. Taxing rich people will not do it, either. The middle class has promised itself benefits that it cannot afford, and neither party is willing to say so. Yet, I cannot believe that the tombstone of the United States of America will say, “Liked Being Lied To.”

3. Tuesday, November 6th. A bunch of Tea Party yahoos will be sent home, elected in frustration with the President, not to misbehave. Neither party will have a working majority in Congress. Just as well. Twelve-straight years of Presidential failure have consumed all margin of safety, and we will either fix our budget within the next Presidential term, or see “tombstone,” above.

Maybe, just maybe, this mix will enable the next President to know what to do for us and to us: a stiff, bad-hair Michigander/Utahan Republican Governor of Massachusetts (wow) who, as he says, has signed both sides of paychecks.

2012 is make or break. Simple as that.

Good Mortgage & Housing News

Posted ago by Cary Cox

The thing about economic indicators is that you need consistency over a period of months to show a trend. An uptick here and there or a down-tick here or there does not constitute a trend.  That being said, recent economic news bodes well for the housing and mortgage industry.

Here is the latest news that effect the housing and mortgage industry as reported by different government agencies:

Government reports on weekly jobless claims, manufacturing activity and inflation offered fresh evidence the U.S. economic recovery is picking up steam.

New U.S. claims for unemployment benefits dropped to a 3 1/2 year low last week, a government report showed on Thursday, suggesting the labor market recovery was gaining speed. Initial claims for state unemployment benefits dropped 19,000 to a seasonally adjusted 366,000, the Labor Department said. That was the lowest level since May 2008.

A gauge of manufacturing in New York State showed growth accelerated in December to its highest level since May as new orders improved, the New York Federal Reserve said in a report on Thursday. The survey of manufacturing plants in the state is one of the
earliest monthly guideposts to U.S. factory conditions. The gain in December added on to improvement last month that pulled the index out of a five-month contraction.

Wholesale prices rose a modest 0.3 percent last month, as companies paid more for such items as food and pharmaceuticals. But energy prices barely rose, keeping inflation in check.

Most economists say they think inflation has peaked and will slowly decline next year. That’s because prices for oil and many agricultural commodities have fallen from their highs this spring. Slower growth in China and a possible recession in Europe have reduced global demand for energy and other goods.

Lower price growth means consumers will have more buying power, potentially boosting consumer spending. The jump in gas and food prices earlier this year limited the ability of consumers to buy other goods, thereby slowing the economy.

Consumer spending rebounded in the July-September quarter as prices eased. The stronger spending helped increase growth to an annual rate of 2 percent from a slight 0.9 percent in the first half of the year. Economists expect consumer spending to rise again in the last three months of this year and think growth could top 3 percent.

Federal Reserve policymakers, like many private economists, predict inflation will fall next year. That would give the central bank more latitude to hold down interest rates and potentially take other steps to stimulate the economy.

My gut tells me these numbers will be short-lived and the economy will continue to suffer in 2012. Not great for housing though it should help keep mortgage rates low.